Written by: T. Paul Cox
Is
agricultural R&D on the decline in the developing world? Is the
public sector taking up the work? And how dependable is funding, in good
and bad economic times? A new Global Assessment of Agricultural
R&D, undertaken by the Agricultural Science and Technology
Indicators (ASTI) initiative as an input to GCARD2, has provided data to
inform the debates and brought up some surprising numbers, challenging
conventional wisdom on the direction of investments in the future of
agriculture. A full set of primary data for the years 2000 to 2008 has
been an eye-opener, in particular, for participants who believed that
investments in the developing world had been slowing down.
"ASTI proved the opposite to be true," says ASTI programme head
Nienke Beintema. "Developing countries have been driving global public
R&D investment growth since 2000. However, much of this growth is
driven by a number of the larger, more advanced middle-income countries,
while investments in many of the poorest countries are stagnating or
declining."
In fact, global public spending rose 22 per cent during the period,
boosting research and development after slow growth in the 1990s. And by
2008 this spending was split almost evenly between developed and
developing countries. In high-income countries, the annual growth of
public investment continued to decline from its 1980s peak and dropped
to near zero after 2005.
It was accelerated spending by China and India that accounted for
close to half of the US$5.6 billion global increase. Argentina, Brazil,
Iran, Nigeria and Russia each contributed another three to four per
cent. Massive investment in R&D by these middle-income rising powers
will be significant to farmers' futures, but the numbers do hide
negative trends in many smaller and poorer states.
The
assessment's 31 low-income countries together accounted for only three
per cent of public spending, just as they did in 1981. This is despite
the fact that their share of the population had risen by four per cent.
And the true difficulties of R&D in low income countries come out in
the measures of spending volatility. Most often dependent on short-term
grants from donors, spending is twice as volatile as in high income
countries, making sustained support of research and development agendas
very difficult to achieve.
A private future?
Amid uncertain public financing and the enormous research costs of
new technologies like transgenic crops, one widespread view is that the
private sector is taking over much of the work of agricultural R&D.
ASTI's Global Assessment does show that private investment in this area
rose 26 per cent from 2000-2008, and more than a fifth of all spending
worldwide is now private.
However, most of this US$18.2 billion in private R&D is spent by
companies in member countries of the Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD), and more than half is on food
processing and product development, which are considered manufacturing
rather than agricultural sector concerns. ASTI programme coordinator,
Gert-Jan Stads notes that its relevance to the world's poor remains
limited.
"The
role of the private sector in agricultural R&D has certainly
increased in a number of emerging economies, including China, India, and
Brazil. But much of the private sector's research is on export
commodities or high-value seed. Food security and nutrition issues
firmly remain in the domain of the public sector. Although the role of
the private sector has increased over the years, agricultural R&D in
the developing world remains a predominantly public affair."
Beyond 2008
Beintema, Stads and their team had the pleasure of seeing their
analysis bear fruit at GCARD2. "The key messages from ASTI featured
prominently in a large number of discussions and presentations at
GCARD," Beintema says. "We believe that ASTI successfully managed to
change the widespread perception among GCARD participants that growth in
agricultural R&D investments in the developing world was
declining."
The full dataset for 179 countries, complete with graphs and tables, has been made available at www.asti.cgiar.org/globaloverview,
where it will continue to inform decisions. ASTI now hopes to bring the
assessment up to 2012 in time for the next GCARD. New rounds of data
collection have already begun in sub-Saharan Africa and South and
Central Asia, other regions will soon follow, however, depending funding
availability.
One big question that will have many looking to the 2008-2012 data is
the impact of the global economic crisis, which has broad implications
for both public and private spending. But Beintema cautions that it is
too early to say how, or if, this might show up in the data.
Date published: January 2013
Post a Comment