Latest Updates :
    Showing posts with label Economy. Show all posts
    Showing posts with label Economy. Show all posts

    Agricultural revenues – Behind the figures

    Pierre Boiteau, Editorial Staff Director

    Agreste––a division of the French Ministry of Agriculture––estimates that the average farm income reached €36,500 in 2012. But this figure conceals three major information items, and a few truths are worth to be told again!


    Sizeable and growing income gaps

    The gaps in agricultural incomes between various farm productions are sizeable. For professional farms in 2012, the French Ministry of Agriculture indicates a current before-tax income (EBIT) per self-employed individual ranging from €15,300 for sheep and goat farmers to €74,400 for large-scale crop farmers.

    Differences also exist within each production, and income dispersion keeps increasing. Even by taking away 25 percent of the lowest incomes and 25 percent of the highest incomes, Agreste indicates that the income range would reach €33,000 in 2011. It is the highest level since 2000.

    French farming is losing prosperity

    The prosperity generated by agriculture is eluding farmers, at least as quickly as their number is declining. To put it in a nutshell, the pie is shrinking each year… but there are fewer and fewer people to share it! The result: a zero-sum operation, or almost.

    The declining number of active farmers softens the lower incomes in poor years, and intensifies higher incomes during the good ones. The trend of “the declining pie” is not a new one and goes back to the 1960s. The volume of national agricultural production grows, but its value deteriorates in real terms. This shows that lower prices for agricultural products are indeed a concrete fact!

    The amount of subsidies (€8.3 billion) remains constant in par value, but drops in real terms. That being said, fewer farmers are sharing nearly the same amount. Some consolation prize!

    A subsidy policy is no substitute for profitable prices

    In 2012, the net income of French farms totaled €16.1 billion––including 50 percent of subsidies––is not enough to ensure an adequate and fair income to all farmers.

    For sheep and beef farming, public support is higher than breeders’ incomes. This amounts to saying that such activity cannot survive without subsidies. Otherwise, agriculture and its core mandate––to feed the people––would be at risk.

    Lucrative prices would guarantee the future of agriculture and livestock farming. Based on production costs to improve margins, a price increase would not be too expensive for consumers or for the food processing chain. Agricultural products only represent a few percentage points in household shopping baskets. But it would bring happiness to farmers! Provided that middlemen dot not absorb the margins… A €100/ton wheat price fluctuation only rises the price of a loaf of bread by one or two cents! 

    Do farmers markets boost area economy?

    Ten years ago, farmers markets in Michigan were few and far between, with only 90 existing in the state. Today, the state boasts more than 250 farmers markets, and a recently-released report finds these markets are more than just a place to shop for local produce. Farmers markets also can boost the economy and provide jobs.
    While farmers markets are growing in numbers nationally, they could be doing a lot better, according to a report released Thursday by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). What’s holding farmers markets back? Federal policies that favor industrial agriculture at their expense, the report stated.
    “On the whole, farmers markets have seen exceptional growth, providing local communities with fresh food direct from the farm,” stated Jeffrey O’Hara, the author of the report and an economist with UCS’s Food and Environment Program. “But our federal food policies are working against them. If the U.S. government diverted just a small amount of the … subsidies it (gives to) industrial agriculture to support these markets and small local farmers, it would not only improve American diets, it would generate tens of thousands of new jobs.”UCS released the report just a few days before the 12th annual U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Farmers Market Week, which starts Sunday. According to the report, “Market Forces: Creating Jobs through Public Investment in Local and Regional Food Systems,” the number of farmers markets nationwide more than doubled between 2000 and 2010, jumping from 2,863 to 6,132, and now more than 100,000 farms sell food directly to local consumers.
    According to the report, all that growth happened with relatively little help from public funding. Last year, for example, the USDA spent $13.7 billion in commodity, crop insurance and supplemental disaster assistance payments mostly to support large industrial farms, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The agency spent less than $100 million that year to support local and regional food system farmers.
    The fact that farmers markets are growing without the help of public funding, however, could show that farmers markets aren’t in need of such assistance, said John Pridnia, who started the Port Austin Farmers Market with his wife, Lisa, seven years ago. He said the federal government spending money to help start farmers markets would be another example of waste.
    “We started ours with a hope, a desire and the energy to succeed,” Pridnia said. “We started with minimum expenditures.”
    Pridnia agrees, though, that farmers markets help boost the local economy. He sees it for himself every weekend in Port Austin.
    “It’s a phenomenal positive for the business community,” he said. “Shoppers stay in town for hours after the market closes to have lunch and (visit businesses). They linger and enjoy the town.”
    Pridnia said a farmers market is a tremendous asset to any community, regardless of the size of the community or the market itself.
    “We have over 150 vendors, but some farmers markets have 15 vendors, but it doesn’t matter the size — the joy is still there,” he said.
    He said he would pit any small-town farmers market against one in an urban community.
    “Bigger is great, but it’s not always better,” he said.
    Pridnia said he and Lisa are invited every year to other communities around the state to give presentations on starting a farmers market. He said so far, they’ve conducted the presentations in about a dozen communities.
    “It’s astounding how popular our market is,” he said. “It’s a place for shoppers to access food direct from the farming community. It’s a place to enjoy the day. It’s also become a social event, not only for the shoppers, but for the vendors. The vendors have created a family among themselves.”
    Pridnia said organizing the Port Austin Farmers Market is definitely a “labor of love” and it wouldn’t be possible without the help of volunteers.
    Pigeon started a weekly farmers market this summer, and it ran in June and July. Amish produce and baked goods were available, along with other products. On average, there were five to seven vendors each week, said Brandis Mallais, Pigeon Chamber of Commerce vice president.
    “A friend and I would travel to Port Austin’s farmers market on weekends to get fresh produce and flowers, and we thought it would be nice to have it here (in Pigeon),” Mallais said.
    Pigeon had a building next to the Pigeon Historical Museum that was not being used, and Mallais said the building was meant for a farmers market. She talked with a co-worker at Thumb National Bank, who had connections to some Amish families. The Pigeon Farmers Market flourished from there.
    “It’s another reason for people to come to town,” she said. “It’s giving people more of an opportunity to stay local.”
    The goal for next year is to start in May and to provide a wider variety of products, she said.
    Mallais said she doesn’t believe farmers markets really need public funding.
    “If anyone needs it, it’s the growers,” she said.
    Considering that agriculture is one of the top industries in Michigan, it seems anywhere in the state would be a prime locale for a farmers market. The state produces more than 200 agricultural commodities, from tart cherries to maple syrup, pickles, cheeses and salsas to beef and fish products, according to the Michigan Department of Agriculture.
    “The agri-food sector in Michigan generates more than $70 billion for our economy, employs one million Michigan workers, and it’s still growing,” said Elaine Brown, executive director of Michigan Food & Farming Systems. “Shopping at farmers markets like this is a wonderful way to support and industry and make fresh, healthy food available for everyone.”
    When growers sell directly to consumers, most of the money recirculates locally. In 2007, the most recent USDA figure, direct agricultural product sales amounted to a $1.2 billion-a-year business.
    “The fact that farmers are selling directly to the people who live nearby means that sales revenue stays local,” O’Hara stated in a release. “That helps stabilize local economies.”
    Keeping revenues local also can mean more job opportunities, the UCS report stated. Last summer, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack asked Congress to set a goal in the 2012 Farm Bill of helping at least 100,000 Americans to become farmers by, among other things, providing entrepreneurial training and support for farmers markets. O’Hara’s report takes up Vilsack’s challenge and argues that supporting local and regional food system expansion is central to meeting that goal.
    In the report, O’Hara identified a number of initiatives the federal government could take to encourage new farmers and the growth of farmers markets in the upcoming Farm Bill. For example, the report called on Congress to:
    • Support the development of local food markets, including farmers markets and farm-to-school programs, which can stabilize community-supported markets and create permanent jobs. For example, the report found that the Farmers Market Promotion Program could create as many as 13,500 jobs nationally over a five-year period, if reauthorized, by providing modest funding for 100 to 500 farmers markets per year.
    • Level the playing field for farmers in rural regions by investing in infrastructure, such as meat-processing or dairy-bottling facilities, which would help meat, dairy and other farmers produce and market their products to consumers more efficiently. These investments could foster competition in food markets, increase product choice for consumers, and generate jobs in the community.
    • Allow low-income residents to redeem food nutrition subsidies at local food markets to help them afford fresh fruits and vegetables. Currently, not all markets are able to accept Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits.
    “Farmers at local markets are a new variety of innovative entrepreneurs, and we need to nurture them,” said O’Hara. “Supporting these farmers should be a Farm Bill priority.”
    LOCAL FARMERS MARKETS
    • Port Austin Farmers Market
    9 a.m. to 1 p.m. until Oct. 15
    Intersection of Lake and State streets, downtown Port Austin
    (989) 738-7600
    • Sebewaing Farmers Market
    9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Aug. 20
    Center Street, downtown
    • Pigeon’s Farmers Market is done for the year, but the goal is to start it up again in May 2012. Call (989) 453- or visit www.pigeonchamber.com.

    Cornucopia Institute reveals agribusiness conspiracy to mislead consumers over almonds

    food

    Cornucopia Institute reveals agribusiness conspiracy to mislead consumers over almonds

    Monday, April 09, 2007
    by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
    Editor of NaturalNews.com
    The Cornucopia Institute, a non-profit organization that promotes honest food and sustainable farming practices, has revealed details of the USDA's conspiracy with agribusiness interests to mislead consumers over the sterilization of almonds. A press release from the Cornucopia Institute, reprinted below, explains that new rules concerning the pasteurization of almonds are an "inside job," made without any real opportunity for public comment.

    The new rules requiring all California almonds to be pasteurized would also place a heavy financial burden on small growers and family farms, ultimately putting many of them out of business, further concentrating control of the food supply in the hands of a few powerful corporations.

    The Cornucopia Institute is concerned about the general trend towards the secretive processing of foods with chemicals or radiation, without honest labeling. The USDA and agricubusiness interests are right now plotting to allow irradiated food to be labeled "pasteurized," with no indication whatsoever of them being subjected to radiation. The purpose of this deception is to deny consumers information about how their foods have been processed, tricking them into purchasing irradiated foods that they might normally avoid.

    "USDA is being run lock, stock, and barrel by agribusiness and has abandoned its duty to protect the public and the farming community. This USDA decision, along with FDA's long-standing refusal to label genetically engineered food, and its recent decision to attempt to label irradiated foods as "pasteurized," is a conscious effort by the Administration to leave consumers in the dark about the dangers lurking in their food." - Andrew Kimbrell, the Director of the Center for Food Safety

    Action item: Write the USDA

    To help consumers take action against this assault on raw almonds and honest food labeling, the Cornucopia Institute has posted a sample letter that may be used to file a comment or complaint with the USDA.

    Click here to download the sample letter (.DOC format). Be sure to modify the letter to state your complaint or comment in your own words. The address to send it to is included in the letter.

    Here is the full press release from the Cornucopia Institute:

    USDA and Agribusiness Conspire to Mislead Consumers

    "Raw" Almonds Must Soon be Steam-Heated or Treated with Toxic Chemical

    CORNUCOPIA, WI: Small-scale farmers, retailers, and consumers are outraged over a new federal regulation that will require all almonds grown in California to be sterilized with various "pasteurization" techniques. The rule, which the USDA quietly developed in response to outbreaks of Salmonella in 2001 and 2004, traced to raw almonds, mandates that all almonds undergo a sterilization process that includes chemical and / or high-temperature treatments.

    Although the final rule was just published in the Federal Register, The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based farm policy research group, is asking the USDA to reopen the proceeding for public comment. Cornucopia contends that the rule was never effectively announced to the public, and that the reasoning behind both the necessity and safety of the sterilization processes should be questioned before the rule goes into effect this September.

    "The new rule is unwarranted and could have many harmful impacts," said Mark Kastel, senior farm policy analyst at Cornucopia. "The costs of the chemical and heat treatments, in addition to the costs of transporting and recording the new procedures, will be especially onerous on small-scale and organic farmers, and could force many out of business."

    The only exemption to these new regulations will be organic "raw" almonds that will not be fumigated, but will undergo the steam-heat treatment, and small-scale growers who can sell truly raw almonds but only direct to the public from farm stands.

    Although foodborne illnesses have garnered headlines in recent years, including contamination of California-grown spinach and lettuce, raw produce and nuts are not inherently risky foods. Contamination occurs when livestock manure or fecal matter is inadvertently transferred to food through contaminated water, soil, or transportation and handling equipment. Raw foods can also be infected by poor employee sanitation either on the farm or in processing facilities.

    Glenn Anderson, a small-scale organic almond farmer in the central valley of California, worries that "This could be one more way for the big companies and the government to put us small farmers out of business."

    The equipment to sterilize almonds is very expensive. A propylene oxide chamber costs $500,000 to $1,250,000, and a roasting line can cost as much as $1,500,000 to $2,500,000.

    Anderson also questions the scientific logic behind the rule. He and some other growers believe that the sustainable farming methods they use, such as mowing and mulching, rather than controlling weeds by chemical herbicide applications, protect biodiversity and naturally prevent the spread of harmful bacteria more effectively than the artificial process of pasteurization (sterilization) -- which attempts to mitigate contamination after the fact. According to growers practicing sustainable farming methods, the USDA plan ignores the root causes of food contamination -- the dangerous and unsustainable farming practices on industrial farms.

    Consumers who oppose the new regulation also worry about its impact on the quality and nutrition of pasteurized almonds, since the Almond Board of California (a marketing arm of the USDA) has conducted the only study on the practice. Their research concluded that "there was no significant degradation in the quality" of the almonds. "The validity of these findings is questionable given the vested interests of the research panel," Kastel stated.

    The most common method of sterilizing almonds is by propylene oxide fumigation. Propylene oxide is a genotoxic chemical and is listed as a possible carcinogen by the International Agency on Cancer Research. In lab experiments, the chemical leads to gene mutation, DNA strand breaks, and neoplastic cell transformation. It is listed as a "possible" carcinogen because no long-term studies have been done with humans. Its use for treating food for human consumption is banned in the European Union, Canada, Mexico, and most other countries.

    It is The Cornucopia Institute's contention that even if independent research concludes that treated almonds are in fact safe, labeling them as "raw" is misleading and deceptive to consumers, many of whom wish to purchase truly raw, unprocessed almonds. "Raw foods are increasingly in demand. The new rule is another case of the public being deprived the opportunity to intelligently choose their food supply," said Jimbo Someck, who owns and operates four of the country’s leading independent natural food stores, in the San Diego area.

    The new regulation to sterilize almonds coincides with the recent announcement by the Food and Drug Administration that it intends to relax its labeling requirements for irradiated food. The FDA proposal will also allow irradiation, the controversial ionization process, to be called pasteurization -- a reference that is troubling many food safety watchdogs.

    "Consumers deserve to know how their food has been processed," said Food and Water Watch Executive Director Wenonah Hauter. "Mislabeling irradiated food as 'pasteurized' or treated food as 'raw' is an industry attempt to make consumers buy products that they otherwise might avoid."

    In light of heightened public concern, the Cornucopia Institute has appealed to USDA Secretary Mike Johannes to postpone implementation of the new regulatory requirements and reopen the almond docket to public comment. Only 18 public comments -- all from the almond industry -- were received on the proposal. Unlike consumers, retailers, or other organizations concerned with food safety, all almond handlers received a personal letter or fax from the USDA alerting them to the sterilization proposal and inviting them to comment.

    "The industry and the USDA tried to slip this through quietly, under the radar, without adequate public scrutiny," Cornucopia's Kastel lamented. "We are asking the Secretary of a unit of government that Abraham Lincoln referred to as the ‘People's Department’ to intervene so concerned citizens can have a say. The close collaboration, away from the eyes of the citizens and the media, we are sure, is not something the Secretary will feel good about."

    An action alert with instructions for contacting the USDA, and a sample letter interested consumers can send to the USDA and California Almond Board, can be found on the Cornucopia Institute Website: www.cornucopia.org

    According to Andrew Kimbrell, the Director of the Center for Food Safety, "The decision to foist fumigants on unsuspecting almond consumers is just another example of an agency out of control." Adds Kimbrell, "USDA is being run lock, stock, and barrel by agribusiness and has abandoned its duty to protect the public and the farming community. This USDA decision, along with FDA’s long-standing refusal to label genetically engineered food, and its recent decision to attempt to label irradiated foods as "pasteurized," is a conscious effort by the Administration to leave consumers in the dark about the dangers lurking in their food."

    FDA regulations currently require that all single-ingredient foods that have been irradiated and are sold by retailers must be labeled as "treated with irradiation" and must display the radura symbol.

    A comprehensive fact sheet on the almond issue can be viewed at www.cornucopia.org/Almond_FactSheet.pdf and a sample letter for interested individuals to send to the USDA can be found at www.cornucopia.org/Almond_SampleLetter.doc

    The Cornucopia Institute (www.Cornucopia.org) is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Through research, advocacy, and economic development, our goal is to empower farmers both politically and through marketplace initiatives.

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/021783_the_USDA_food_labeling.html#ixzz2FQBXMr00

    Promotion olive Cultivation for economic development in poverty alleviation

    Promotion olive Cultivation for economic development in poverty alleviation


    The plans to plant olive saplings in KP and the rest of Pakistan can bear fruit

    By Tahir Ali

    With high global demand and rising prices in the international market and Pakistan’s annual edible oil import bill exceeding $2bn, the rationale of recent olive cultivation initiatives in the country cannot be overemphasized. Olive demand globally is on the rise. Germans are using five times more and British ten times more olive than they did in 1990. In America, olive demand is growing by 6pc annually for two decades now. Olive prices in world market have doubled to $3,400 a ton recently. Pakistan has over 0.8mn hectares of wasteland suitable for olive cultivation. An official of the now defunct Pakistan Oil Seeds Development Board (PODB) had told this writer that by covering the area with olive plants, Pakistan can produce around 1.84mn tons of olive oil. This would fetch over $6bn at the current rate of olive in world market.
    The Pakistan agricultural research council (PARC) has begun implementing the project “Promotion of olive cultivation for economic development and poverty alleviation” whereby olive plants will be cultivated on 300 hectares in Balochistan, 100 hectares in KP, 300 hectares in federally administered tribal areas and 100 hectares in the Pothohar region of Punjab. The Rs382mn project to be completed in three years is being under the Pakistan Italian debt-for-development swap agreement.
    The Punjab Agriculture and Meat Company also plans to develop 10 certified nurseries. These nurseries –being opened through private sector in Attock, Rawalpindi, Chakwal, Jehlum and Khushab districts –would have a catchment area of 27000 acres and would have an impact of $78mn. The potential area suitable for olive cultivation is around 8mn acres in Punjab of which 0.4mn is being targeted though this initiative. Total impact of this land, if covered, would be $1.16bn.

    Similarly, in KP’s budget for 2012-13, a Rs100mn project –research and development on European olive and maintenance of model olive farm Sangbhatti Mardan –has been started and allocated Rs15mn this year. As the PODB stands dissolved, Sangbhatti olive farm, one of its assets, has been handed over to the directorate of agriculture research in KP. “The department will provide olive plantlets, grafts and buds produced in the Sangbhatti farm to farmers. Though the production of olive nursery is limited at present, it is nevertheless sufficient for the time being,” says an official of KP agriculture ministry wishing anonymity. “Despite our efforts, mass resort to olive plantation is however unlikely in the immediate future,” the official adds.
    Pakistan has been unable to increase its olive acreage and yield for indifference by successive governments, lack of private sector’s interest, focus on other cash crops, security situation in KP and tribal belt, too few olive nurseries and marketing worries. It only has 1130 acres of land under productive olive trees and the crop is yet to be inserted into the cropping system. The question arises: will the new initiatives succeed?

    While olive farmers usually grow olive haphazardly, the problem is multiplied by non-availability of standard olive plants and restricted mobility of local and foreign experts in the olive-rich but militancy-hit tribal belt, KP and Balochistan. This explains why there has been of late a shift of focus to other parts of the country. Olive acreage and yield could be increased by providing quality seed, polythene rolls for wrapping round the buds/grafts to save them from cold and moisture, modern training and marketing support to olive farmers. Have similar interventions been planned?
    Pakistan has over 0.8mn hectares suitable area for olive but as most farmers on fertile lands prefer other crops, the potential area may be around 0.264mh. Even if a third of this area is brought under olive cultivation, around 25mn olive seedlings would be needed (@250 trees per hectare) over the next few years. Has this been considered? Pakistan need to shift to tissue culture technology, standardise its nursery production and open more germplasm units to provide enough olive seeds, buds and grafts. Olive tree usually bears fruit after 4-5 years. However, Sultan Ali Khan, a farmer from Swat, says his community had grafted around 40000 wild olive trees but only 5000 of them have been successful and have started bearing fruit after 7-8 years. Shafeeq Ahmad from Swari, Buner says an olive plant could bear over 40-45kg of fruit if sufficient care, protection, pesticides and fertilisers are provided to the plants.

    “We planted 600 olive plants on a mountain ridge around ten years ago but it is yet to bear plentiful fruit. Bearing of fruit was late and paltry because the orchards could not be looked after well nor were provided sufficient and timely doses of fertiliser and pesticides as the farmers were not given guidance and help,” he tells TNS. Another problem is that very ambitious projects are launched but are later forgotten. For example, there is no mention of the projects of establishment of olive orchards in KP and that of research, development and promotion of olive in KP which were allocated funds in the last two budgets but not in this fiscal and have been left out incomplete. A report on the Malakand olive development prepared by ISCOS, an international organisation, had urged induction of more olive technicians, modern training for them and increase in their salaries, introduction of a system of reward for successful olive farmers, subsidized provision of olive plants, and interaction between all the stakeholders in the olive production chain. The PODB had converted quite a few wild olive plants into fruit bearing trees. That process needs to be continued.

    The planners also need to ensure olive production is developed on commercial lines and its enterprises facilitated. Olives are grown by the methods of budding and grafting of wild olive trees or planting of new trees. However, farmers have found the method of grafting most successful. A research showed that around 80-90pc olive trees grown through T-Grafting technique from August to September were successful. The areas with an altitude between 400 and 1,700 meters, slope of 20°, rainfall between 250 mm and 1,000 mm and having a warm, semi arid, winter rain climate are mostly suitable for olive plants. Olive trees can endure low temperature of even -9° C but these can hardly tolerate it at vegetative stage. It however needs a bit low temperatures in winter to be able to produce good amount of inflorescences and flowers in spring. The common diseases in olive plants are trunk decay, sooty mould and peacock spot, which decay and dry up the tree. The olive trees need more nitrogenous fertilizer than phosphorous and potash. The latter two fertilizers should be mixed in the soil before planting of trees at the rate of 200 kg and 300 kg per hectare respectively. Best time of nitrogen fertilizer is pre-flowering and stone-hardening stage.


    Reference by: "THE NEWS" (Dated: 07th Sept. 2012)

    The New breed: Pakistan olive plantation intiatives

    With high global demand and rising prices in the international market and Pakistan’s annual edible oil import bill exceeding $2bn, the rationale of recent olive cultivation initiatives in the country cannot be overemphasized.
    Olive demand globally is on the rise. Germans are using five times more and British ten times more olive than they did in 1990. In America, olive demand is growing by 6% annually for two decades now. Olive prices in world market have doubled to $3,400 a ton recently.
    Pakistan has over 0.8mn hectares of wasteland suitable for olive cultivation. An official of the now defunct Pakistan Oil Seeds Development Board (PODB) had told this writer that by covering the area with olive plants, Pakistan can produce around 1.84mn tons of olive oil. This would fetch over $6bn at the current rate of olive in world market.
    Olive is used in foods, pickles, medicines, food preservation, textile industry and cosmetic preparation etc. Special restaurants dealing in olive foods have also been opened in various cities of the country.
    The Pakistan agricultural research council (PARC) has begun implementing the project “Promotion of olive cultivation for economic development and poverty alleviation” whereby olive plants will be cultivated on 300 hectares in Baluchistan, 100 hectares in KP, 300 hectares in federally administered tribal areas and 100 hectares in the Pothohar region of Punjab.
    The Rs382mn project to be completed in three years is being under the Pakistan Italian debt-for-development swap agreement.
    The Punjab government has declared the Pothowar region as Olive Valley. It recently distributed thousands of olive plants amongst olive growers and trained them.
    The Punjab Agriculture and Meat Company also plans to develop 10 certified nurseries. These nurseries –being opened through private sector in Attock, Rawalpindi, Chakwal, Jehlum and Khushab districts –would have a catchment area of 27000 acres and would have an impact of $78mn.
    The potential area suitable for olive cultivation is around 8mn acres in Punjab of which 0.4mn is being targeted though this initiative. Total impact of this land, if covered, would be $1.16bn.
    Similarly, in KP’s budget for 2012-13, a Rs100mn project –research and development on European olive and maintenance of model olive farm Sangbhatti Mardan –has been started and allocated Rs15mn this year.
    As the PODB stands dissolved, Sangbhatti olive farm, one of its assets, has been handed over to the directorate of agriculture research in KP.
    “The department will provide olive plantlets, grafts and buds produced in the Sangbhatti farm to farmers. Though the production of olive nursery is limited at present, it is nevertheless sufficient for the time being,” said an official of KP agriculture ministry wishing anonymity.
    “Despite our efforts, mass resort to olive plantation is however unlikely in the immediate future,” the official added.
    Pakistan has been unable to increase its olive acreage and yield for indifference by successive governments, lack of private sector’s interest, focus on other cash crops, security situation in KP and tribal belt, too few olive nurseries and marketing worries. It only has 1130 acres of land under productive olive trees and the crop is yet to be inserted into the cropping system.
    The question arises: will the new initiatives succeed?
    While olive farmers usually grow olive haphazardly, the problem is multiplied by non-availability of standard olive plants and restricted mobility of local and foreign experts in the olive-rich but militancy-hit tribal belt, KP and Baluchistan. This explains why there has been of late a shift of focus to other parts of the country.
    Olive acreage and yield could be increased by providing quality seed, polythene rolls for wrapping round the buds/grafts to save them from cold and moisture, modern training and marketing support to olive farmers. Have similar interventions been planned?
    Pakistan has over 0.8mn hectares suitable area for olive but as most farmers on fertile lands prefer other crops, the potential area may be around 0.264mh. Even if a third of this area is brought under olive cultivation, around 25mn olive seedlings would be needed (@250 trees per hectare) over the next few years. Has this been considered?
    Pakistan need to shift to tissue culture technology, standardise its nursery production and open more germplasm units to provide enough olive seeds, buds and grafts.
    Olive tree usually bears fruit after 4-5 years. However, Sultan Ali Khan, a farmer from Swat, said his community had grafted around 40000 wild olive trees but only 5000 of them have been successful and have started bearing fruit after 7-8 years.
    Shafeeq Ahmad from Swari Buner said an olive plant could bear over 40-45kg of fruit if sufficient care, protection, pesticides and fertilisers are provided to the plants.
    “We planted 600 olive plants on a mountain ridge around ten years ago but it is yet to bear plentiful fruit. Bearing of fruit was late and paltry because the orchards could not be looked after well nor were provided sufficient and timely doses of fertiliser and pesticides as the farmers were not given guidance and help,” he told the TNS.
    Another problem is that very ambitious projects are launched but are later forgotten. For example, there is no mention of the projects of establishment of olive orchards in KP and that of research, development and promotion of olive in KP which were allocated funds in the last two budgets but not in this fiscal and have been left out incomplete.
    A report on the Malakand olive development prepared by ISCOS, an international organisation, had urged induction of more olive technicians, modern training for them and increase in their salaries, introduction of a system of reward for successful olive farmers, subsidized provision of olive plants, sensitizing farmers against cutting and grazing of animals in olive orchards and an in-depth dialogue and interaction between all the stakeholders in the olive production chain.
    The PODB had converted quite a few wild olive plants into fruit bearing trees. That process needs to be continued.
    The planners also need to ensure olive production is developed on commercial lines and its enterprises facilitated.
    Where and how to plant?
    Olives are grown by the methods of budding and grafting of wild olive trees or planting of new trees. However farmers have found the method of grafting the most successful. A research showed that around 80-90% olive trees grown through T-Grafting technique from August to September were successful.
    The areas with an altitude between 400 and 1,700 meters, slope of 20°, rainfall between 250 mm and 1,000 mm and having a warm, semi arid, winter rain climate are mostly suitable for olive plants.
    Olive production varies on the basis of temperature and rainfall. Rain falls abundantly in March (olive flowering season) and in summer in Pakistan. This rain pattern could pose threats for the olive cultivation –the first may heavily reduce the production and the second –rainfall in summer –could make it prone to various plant diseases. It requires extra care and more use of pesticides.
    Olive trees can endure low temperature of even -9° C but these can hardly tolerate it at vegetative stage. It however needs a bit low temperatures in winter to be able to produce good amount of inflorescences and flowers in spring.
    Olives require well drained soils for adequate growth. Heavily clayish or sandy soils or one prone to water logging should be avoided.
    The common diseases in olive plants are trunk decay, sooty mould and peacock spot, which decay and dry up the tree.
    The olive trees need more nitrogenous fertilizer than phosphorous and potash. The latter two fertilizers should be mixed in the soil before planting of trees at the rate of 200 kg and 300 kg per hectare respectively. Best time of nitrogen fertilizer is pre-flowering and stone-hardening stage.

    HAY CROPS - CULTIVATION METHODS


    No crop is grown for hay alone; most of those described are used for sown pasture, or are field crops such as cereals or pulses. The cultural techniques and levels of input for other uses may differ from those for haymaking, and therefore that information should be sought elsewhere. Cultivation for hay is discussed, with the emphasis on techniques suited to small- and medium-scale farms. Hay crops are grown on arable land, where they must compete with other field crops on the grounds of profitability. As haymaking costs are proportional not only to the area worked, but also to the weight of the crop, intensive to semi-intensive methods aiming at high yields per unit area are therefore generally advocated.
    Where land scarcity is the major limiting factor, increased yield per unit area may be the best way of improving fodder availability. This was demonstrated in Pakistan in an FAO-assisted project (Bhatti and Khan, 1996). Fodder crops cover some 19% of Pakistan's total cropped area, but there is still a chronic forage deficit; the area under fodder remained static during 1977 - 1994, at around 2 600 000 ha, while yields rose over 20%, from 17.4 t/ha to 21.4 t/ha, during the period. Well-grown crops of proven cultivars can produce 60 to 80 t/ha of green fodder (most fodder is irrigated), but there are still problems in assuring the supply of good seed and planting material at farm level.
    In another study, in Punjab, Hanjra (1996) gives the results of 200 on-farm trials carried out over three years with the poorest and smallest dairy farmers in central Punjab. The "improved" methods mostly had three parameters which differed from the farmers' own methods: seed quality; sowing method (including land preparation); and date of sowing. The results are presented in Table 2. Yields are below the very high levels attained on research units and some large farms, but the effect of good seed, sown at the correct time, on a well prepared seed bed - all cheap inputs - is striking, with yields improved by 20 to 40%, except for sorghum, where no improved fodder cultivars are available.
    Table 2. Yields of fodders with traditional and improved cultivation in the Punjab
    Crop
    Yield (t/ha; green)
    Percentage increase
    Traditional
    Improved method
    Sorghum
    18.5
    20.0
    7.5
    Hybrid sorghum(1)
    -
    52.5
    -
    Maize
    15.5
    19.4
    20.1
    Berseem
    26.3
    38.5
    30.9
    Lucerne
    25.0
    34.4
    27.3
    Oats
    15.0
    24.6
    39.0
    Berseem+sarson+oats
    32.0
    41.3
    22.5
    Note: (1) Hybrid sorghum is multi-cut.

    Land preparation

    Clearing and levelling
    Where fodder is cultivated for hay-making, the land must be prepared for mowing as well as put into a fit state for sowing and establishing the crop. Stones, stumps and termite mounds should be removed. Land with a long history of cultivation by the plough may require little or no treatment, but any field to be sown must be cleared of all obstructions to harvesting equipment. Under rainfed conditions, land levelling to facilitate mowing, as well as to make sowing of small seeds at even depth possible, is often necessary: even small humps and hollows make sowing at a uniform, shallow depth impossible and lead to gaps and uneven stands. For irrigated crops, of course, proper levelling is essential for effective water distribution. In-field irrigation structures should be designed to facilitate harvest, especially for perennial and multi-cut crops.
    A firm, level seed bed is necessary for all fodders for hay, and for small-seeded pasture-type crops it must also be fine. Preparation methods vary with the type of farm and soil conditions. Whatever the means of primary and secondary cultivations, rolling in the final stages of seed-bed preparation, where possible, is advisable for all small-seeded crops. In tropical and semi-arid areas, work should follow the contour and, where necessary, precautions against washout should be taken. Most fodders have excellent erosion control qualities, once established, but the time of sowing and a short while thereafter are critical.
    Fertilizing
    Hay is a demanding crop and mineral deficiencies must be made good before sowing. It is a highly extractive crop, since all is removed from the field. Farmyard manure is rarely returned to fodder fields in developing countries, although it may be used on other parts of the farm, especially for horticultural crops. In large areas of the irrigated subtropics where fodder cultivation is important, most of the dung is used as fuel. In mechanized, intensive, large-scale dairying, however, the excreta is now handled in aqueous solution - slurry - which is widely used for top-dressing grass, adding fertility (from concentrates and other bought in feeds) and disposing of a difficult by-product in an ecologically benign way.
    Soil fertility status should be determined before pasture installation. Local knowledge may allow a reasonable estimate to be made, but analysis may be necessary. While levels of laboratory accuracy may be very high, the value of analyses are only as good as sampling accuracy, so care should be taken, and advice sought if necessary on sampling methodology.
    Phosphorus (symbol: P) is a major nutrient for all crops and its value is well established for fodder and grassland. Soils are usually deficient in available phosphorus unless they have been heavily fertilized in the past. It is essential for root and seedling establishment and should be present in the seedbed in adequate quantity and in a readily available form. It is also very necessary for legume persistence, and phosphatic top-dressings are frequently necessary to support persistence. It is progressively fixed by soil minerals after application, and on some tropical soils this process may be rapid and severe and almost permanent. However, there is thereafter a slow release, on which the sward relies for development. In grazed swards, much of the phosphorus is recycled through droppings. In hay crops, of course, this is not the case.
    Potassium (symbol: K) is an essential nutrient, with a relatively high concentration in green leaves. Hays contain 2 - 3% in their DM, so it is a very potassium-extracting crop (a two-ton crop would remove the equivalent of 55 kg of potash fertilizer). It is required to complement nitrogen where high yields are the aim, as in hay production. Soil availability varies widely. Clovers are very sensitive to potassium deficiency.
    Sulphur (symbol: S) is required in about the same quantity as phosphorus by plants, and legumes are often very responsive. However, it is much less used consciously as a fertilizer. Soil availability varies very widely. Some of the older fertilizers contained large amounts of sulphur; single superphosphate contains more sulphur than phosphorus; sulphate of ammonia supplies a lot of sulphur; basic slag, which was a major pasture fertilizer in industrial countries, contained appreciable amounts. More concentrated fertilizers with little sulphur are now common (partly to reduce transport and handling costs) and the steel-making process which produced slag is now little used, so the possibility of sulphur supply limiting production must be kept in mind.
    Trace elements, or micronutrients, are limiting in some areas and application of tiny quantities in such cases can have spectacular effects. However, they should only be used, including cocktail mixtures, when a deficiency has been identified.
    Nitrogen (symbol: N) is, of course, essential to all crop growth and its supply is one of the major limiting factors in forage production. An adequate nitrogen supply is essential, either as fertilizer or through biological fixation by legumes. Leguminous crops with effective nodulation will fix an appreciable amount of atmospheric nitrogen and add it to the overall farm nitrogen balance, but inputs of non-nitrogenous mineral fertilizer are needed to support this, as are increased management inputs in the case of mixed swards. For hay crops, heavy applications of N, including maintenance top-dressings between harvests, are limited by the resultant increasing density of sward, which hinders drying and can cause lodging and subsequent harvesting difficulties and losses. In small-scale farming situations, unbalanced use of fertilizer is a common fault: for unsophisticated users, the eye-catching responses to nitrogen top-dressing tend to eclipse the essential basal inputs of phosphorus and other necessary minerals. Nitrogenous fertilizer on legumes is wasteful and depresses biological nitrogen fixation.
    Dressings for establishment will vary greatly according to local conditions, while maintenance fertilizer will depend on the management system. Levels should be decided according to local experience and research. A basal dressing of phosphatic (P) fertilizer is almost always necessary, and potash (K) is frequently needed; for non-legumes some nitrogen is necessary in the seed bed. Sometimes sulphur is deficient and leguminous crops, especially lucerne, can give large responses.
    Calcium (symbol: Ca) is necessary for growth and legume nodulation. Under humid temperate conditions, heavy periodic liming, to raise the pH, is sometimes done. This is not suitable for tropical acid soils, but these may benefit from light dressings (600 kg/ha) of lime as a nutrient.
    Micronutrient deficiencies should be dealt with where reported.
    The forms of fertilizer used will often depend on local availability. For example, single superphosphate is recognized as being the best phosphate source for most fodders and pastures, but its phosphorus content is relatively low (17 to 18% P2O5, as opposed to 42% in triple superphosphate), so it is not interesting if long transport is involved.

    Seed and planting material

    The choice of crops for different situations and conditions is discussed in Chapter VIII. It is always advisable to use clean, healthy seed of the best adapted cultivars available. In developed countries, the pasture and fodder seed market poses few problems, although the availability of seed in bulk tends to be limited to a relatively narrow range of species and cultivars. In many developing countries, the fodder seed situation is difficult, especially for specialized fodder and pasture plants (as opposed to cereals or pulses used as fodders). Often, national priority has, in the past and probably correctly, been placed on producing seed of the major subsistence and cash crops, with fodder taking second place. The importance of livestock in most small-scale farming systems, and the present need for on-farm fodder production, however, mean that this imbalance should be rectified. The international seed market often provides only cultivars suited to a limited range of conditions (whatever the claims of the merchants) and is dominated by countries with a large internal fodder market, notably Australia, New Zealand and the USA.
    Traditional fodder landraces, in developing countries, are often only available as farmers' seed from unselected crops, of very doubtful cleanness and purity. It has often been clearly demonstrated that fodder yields per unit area can be greatly increased, often more than doubled, by using good seed of locally proven cultivars and landraces. Many countries have the knowledge and basic seed within their research systems; the problem is how to develop a sustainable, local commercial production and distribution chain. In the sections on individual crops, cultivars will be mentioned; it must, however, be kept in mind that although a cultivar has performed well under similar agro-ecological conditions on another continent or in another country, it does not mean that it can be transferred to a new area with confidence. For example, local disease patterns differ, therefore fodder sorghums selected abroad and imported to Africa, where there is a strong disease challenge, often perform very poorly.

    Irrigated hay

    Fodder is a widespread irrigated crop in arid and semi-arid zones. Under small-scale farming conditions, usually within a mixed farming system, the greatest areas of cultivated fodder in the developing world are on irrigated lands in the Near East and the Indian subcontinent, often in wheat-rice farming systems and associated with milch buffaloes. Irrigation areas specifically for fodder are rare in the small-scale farming and pastoral sectors, but that in Xinjiang (Altai) (see Case Study 4 in Chapter XI) is a notable exception. In the large-scale sector, however, highly specialized fodder growing, again often associated with dairying, is common. Irrigation layouts should be so designed as to present the minimum hindrance to agricultural and haymaking equipment and should allow easy access for transport of the bulky crop. An adequate drainage system, to allow the fields to be dried off before mowing, is highly desirable.
    Components of an irrigation system
    Irrigation is not an end in itself, nor does the simple supply of water and seed to land assure a sustainable and economic increase in output. There is a complex interaction between the land and water base, agricultural practices and cropping choices, which interact on the system and affect its production, profitability and labour efficiency. The management and maintenance of irrigation require discipline; traditional systems depend on a stable community decision-making system, and all interventions require, well before proposal or execution, discussion at both household and community level. Irrigated farming communities are well aware of the systems' complexities. The main components are: (i) production activities (choice of crops, cropping and livestock system); (ii) on-farm water management (optimization of yield, and use of labour and inputs); (iii) the delivery system; (iv) the water supply system (relationship with local hydraulic system, reliability, quality, timing of supply); and (v) downstream implications (waterlogging, salinity, disposal of drainage). These are considered in more detail in the following sections.
    Production activities
    The choice of crops and cropping mixture is determined, within any climatic zone, by water availability, water quality, soils and the local market (both for sale of produce and supply of inputs). Where water is the limiting factor, the producers' aim is often to maximize return per unit of water.
    On-farm water management
    It is of the utmost importance that best use be made of the water delivered to the farm in order to optimize yield, not only of individual crops, but also of the farm crop mix, to optimize water-use efficiency, and to obviate land degradation due to waterlogging or salinization. The scheduling of water application to suit the plant-soil-water relationship of the site is essential. In addition to a good delivery system, in-field work is necessary. Proper land preparation, including levelling and grading, is essential to facilitate water application, economize on labour and power and to optimize input use (e.g., watering must be so designed that fertilizer remains within the root-run of the crops and is not lost in the drainage water.
    These operations are essential to the correct running of an irrigated farm; their application requires knowledge of crop agronomy, land and water management
    The delivery system
    The system between the offtake and the farmers' fields requires both management and maintenance. Management must assure equity in water apportionment and assure the timing of each farmer's water delivery. It must also ensure that the canals and works are properly maintained; prior agreement on how this will be done is a prerequisite to any interventions. Maintenance, usually through communal participation, is arduous and can be time-consuming. It is often possible, through some redesigning and modification, to provide systems that are less liable to siltation and therefore require less maintenance.
    The supply system
    Two main aspects must be studied: the effect of an offtake on water availability for other areas downstream, and possible negative effects on the hydrological system. The final decision on most major offtakes, therefore, cannot be decided by discussion with the potential users alone, as all parties likely to be affected must be consulted. Modern, solid structures not only greatly reduce maintenance labour but allow a modification and prolongation of the cropping system by permitting irrigation over a much longer season.
    Downstream implications
    Irrigation systems can have undesirable effects on land downstream through salinization, waterlogging and damage caused as a result of drainage water disposal. Both the design of the delivery and the management of the water at farm level are involved. It is very important that these aspects be taken into account before interventions are undertaken. Since the user community may not be directly affected by the downstream damage, such effects must be judged in the light of their wider community and environmental effect.
    Types of irrigation
    Surface irrigation, in which the water is distributed through flooding by basin, border and furrow, is the ancient, traditional system, which still accounts for the vast majority of the world's irrigated farmland. It is likely that most irrigated small-scale farming fodder will be watered in this way. Surface water is distributed in several ways, and the main ones are discussed briefly below insofar as they affect fodder work.
    The subject is very complicated. Standard texts should be consulted (such as Kay, 1986) for information on layout of irrigation units, their organization, and details of irrigation methodology. Crop water requirements and guidelines for their prediction are discussed in another FAO publication by Doorenbos (FAO, 1984). In considering irrigation of hay, however, care should be taken that the method chosen does not unduly hinder the use of whatever machinery is foreseen and that there will be adequate access at haymaking time for the type of transport to be used to remove the crop.
    Basin irrigation
    Basin irrigation is the oldest and simplest system: a field is divided into one or more basins; each basin is a piece of level land surrounded by a bund which retains water until it has soaked into the soil. It can be adapted to many crops and farming systems, but for fodder production it is very labour demanding and practically precludes any mechanization of harvesting, unless very large basins can be used. The in-field bunds have to be removed at each cutting, and in the case of multi-cut crops, reconstructed thereafter.
    Border irrigation
    Border irrigation (also known as border-check and border strips) resembles basin irrigation in that the fields are divided into units by bunds, but borders slope away from the farm channel in the direction of water flow. They are not level and the method of irrigating is different. The water is not retained on the field to soak in, but soaks in as it flows over the land, so it is important to use the correct flow for the correct duration to ensure that the correct amount of water infiltrates into the soil. This system is much better suited to haymaking than is basin irrigation. If cultivation and/or harvest is mechanized, border width should fit the equipment to be used.
    Furrow irrigation
    This is the most widely used system for row-crops: water does not flow over the entire soil area, but is confined to furrows between the crop rows, and infiltrates into the bottom and sides of the furrow. It is excellent for large fodder crops such as Napier grass, maize and sorghum, but it is not suited to hay corps. If cultivation and/or harvest is mechanized, row width should suit the equipment to be used.
    Spate irrigation
    Here the supply is dependent on torrents with only occasional flow, as after heavy rain or snow-melt. Traditional offtakes are very labour intensive, can often only be used when river levels are low, and may be completely destroyed by snow-melt floods in summer at a season when irrigated cropping can be very productive.
    Qanat
    This is a system (also called karez) of tapping underground springs by gently sloping tunnelling to transport it (underground) to cultivated land. It is widespread in parts of Iran and Afghanistan and is used as far east as the Turfan Depression in China.
    Piped systems
    Various systems of (usually underground) piping of water have been devised to reduce the enormous wastage of open-channel systems and to thus free more land for cultivation. The water is usually supplied to the field through up-pipes with valves (risers) in the case of underground pipes, or through gated pipes where they are on the surface. Accurate levelling and some in-field structures are still required for such systems. Alfalfa risers have their valves just below mean soil level so that once the crop is established the mower and other machinery can pass over them unobstructed.
    Sprinkler irrigation
    This requires a considerable investment in equipment, but has the advantage that great investment in land-levelling, drainage and other infrastructures is not needed; less land is occupied with irrigation structures; water is more efficiently used; and there is minimal danger of seepage losses and salinization through rising water tables. It does away with the need for in-field structures which hinder fodder harvesting.
    Centre pivot
    Centre pivot systems are large, computer controlled sprinkler systems which rotate around a central axis. They are widely used for fodder crops in semi-arid or desert areas, such as Saudi Arabia and California. They are primarily for large-scale commercial farms where fodder is a high-value crop, and are well suited to the task.
    Cold season watering of hay-fields
    Watering of natural hay fields before the thaw is traditional in parts of Russia and Mongolia. Water is diverted from springs and streams on to areas reserved for hay, with or without some in-field structures, and is stored by freezing on the surface. Traditional water-spreading methods practised in the Mongolian mountain-and-steppe zone involve sporadic diversion of streams to develop ice-sheets over hay land which will, thereafter, melt at the onset of the growing season.

    مویشیوں پر موسمِ گرما کے اثرات، پیداوار اور صحت


    تحریر: حافظ وصی محمد خاں
    پاکستان کو دودھ پیدا کرنے والے پانچ بڑے ممالک میں شمار کیا جاتا ہے۔ لیکن ایک عام پاکستانی کو اگر خالص دودھ میسر نہ ہو تو اس کو کیا سروکار کہ پاکستان کا کون سا نمبر ہے۔ پاکستان میں تاریخی طور پر جانوروں سے حاصل ہونے والے دودھ کی تقسیم کچھ اس طرح ہے کہ سردیوں میں دودھ خریدنے والا نہیں ملتا اور گرمیوں میں دودھ بیچنے والا نہیں ملتا اور یہی وجہ ہے کہ طلب ورسد میں زمین آسمان کا فرق ہو جائے تو دودھ کی قیمتیں بھی بڑھتی ہیں اور ملاوٹ کے تمام اخلاقی ریکارڈ بھی توڑ دیئے جاتے ہیں۔ گرمیوں میں دودھ لینے والا تو زیادہ رقم دے کر یہ سمجھتا ہے کہ خالص دودھ پی رہا ہے لیکن یہ اللہ ہی بہتر جانتا ہے کہ ودھ میں ملاوٹ کرنے والے فنکاروں نے کون کون سے ضرر رساں اجزا ملا کر فروخت کیا ہے۔ گرمیوں میں دودھ کی کمی کی سب سے بڑی وجہ ایک طرف برسیم کا چارہ ختم ہونے کے بعد چارے کا نہ ہونا ہے اور دوسری جانب درجہ حرارت کی زیادتی کی وجہ سے جانوروں کے جسم اور جانوروں کی پیداواری صلاحیت کا متاثر ہونا ہے۔ اگر مویشی پال حضرات ان دونوں مسائل کا حل اپنے حالات کے مطابق ڈھونڈ نکالیں تو جانوروں کی نہ صرف پیداواری صلاحیت بہتر ہو گی بلکہ وہ صحت پر پڑنے والے اثرات سے بھی محفوظ رہیں گے۔ صلاحیت اور صحت پر پڑنے والے برے اثرات سے جانور بھی محفوظ رہ سکتا ہے اور اس کی پیداواری صلاحیت بھی متاثر نہ ہو گی۔
    Copyright Agriculture Information Bank www.agrinfobank.com
    گرمیوں میں برسیم کے بعد جانوروں کو چارہ کی عدم فراہمی کا بہترین علاج چارہ کی بہتر منصوبہ بندی خشک چارہ اور سائیلیج (اچارے کا اچار) کے حصول کی تیاری ہے۔ خشک چارہ اور سائیلیج تیار کرنا ایسی ٹیکنالوجی نہیں جو پاکستان میں نہ مل سکتی ہو۔ تھوڑی سی تگ ودو کے بعد کسان اپنے جانوروں کو سارا سال یکساں قسم کی خواراک مہیا کر سکتا ہے اور یہ یکساں قسم کی خوراک فراہم کرنا جانوروں کی صحت اور پیداوار کی ضمانت ہے۔ جہاں پر کم وسائل والے مویشی پال ہوں وہ اپنے رویوں میں مثبت تبدیلی لاتے ہوئے اشتراکی عمل کو فروغ دے کر سائیلیج کی پیداوار کا اجتماعی حل ڈھونڈ سکتے ہیں۔
    دوسرا بڑا مسئلہ گرمیوں کے موسم میں جانور پر سخت گرمی اور حبس کے اثرات سے بچانا ہے۔

    سخت گرمی اور حبس کے دبائو کا مطلب:

    اس دبائو کا معروف معنوں میں مطلب یہ ہے کہ جب جانور کے جسم پر موسم کی شدت ان کے برداشت کرنے کی شدت سے زیادہ ہو جائے تو اس دبائو کو گرمی کا دبائو کہا جا تا ہے۔

    گرمی کے دبائو کے اہم ترین عوامل

    ٭ ہوا کا درجہ حرارت
    ٭ ہو امیں موجود نمی کا تناسب

    سورج کے شعائوں کی شدت اور گرم ہوائوں کی رفتار:

    جب ہوا کا ٹمپریچر 23 ڈگری سے زیادہ اور ہوا میں نمی کا تناسب 8 ڈگری سے زیادہ وتو یہ دودھ دینے والے جانوروں کی پیداواری صلاحیت پر معکوس اثر ڈالنا شروع کر دیتا ہے۔ ہو امیں زیادہ نمی کا تناسب جانوروں کی حرارت برقرار رکھنے یا سانس لینے کے عمل کو متاثر کرتا ہے۔ الحمد للہ ہمارے پاس 65 ملین بڑے جانوروں میں جس میں دودھ دینے والی بھینسیں اور گائیں برابر تعداد میں شامل ہیں اگر ان تمام جانوروں کو موسم کی شدت اور چارے کی کمی سے گرمی میں محفوظ رکھا جائے تو گرمیوں میں بھی دودھ اسی طرح وافر مقدار میں ملے گا جس طرح سردیوں میں ملتا ہے مویشی پال حضرات اپنے جانوروں کی اور ملکی مفاد میں درج ذیل نکات پر غور کر کے عمل فرمائیں تو ایسا کرنے میں وہ خود بھی خوشحال ہوں گے اور ملک کے باسیوں کو بھی خالص اور تازہ دودھ میسر آسکے گا۔
    الحمد للہ ہماری بھینسیں پانی میں رہنا زیادہ پسند کرتی ہیں اور اگر جانوروں کو ایسے تالاب کی سہولت میسر ہو جہاں جانور اپنی مرضی کے مطابق رہ سکیں تو بھینسوں پر گرمی کے اثر کو کافی حد تک زائل کیا جا سکتا ہے۔ راقم الحروف نے ایسے فارم بھی دیکھے ہیں جہاں اس سہولت کے میسر ہونے پر جانور صرف کھانے اور سونے کے وقت تالاب سے باہر نکلتا ہے اور ماحول کا ٹمپریچر خودبخود ان کے پانی میں جانے اور پانی سے نکالنے کے عمل کو کنٹرول کرتا ہے۔

    گرمی کے دبائو کے اثرات:

    زیادہ دودھ دینے والے جانوروں پر گرمی کا زیادہ اثرہوتا ہے۔ کمزور اور بیماری سے متاثر جانوروں پر بھی اس کا اثر زیادہ ہو گا۔ اس دبائو کے نتائج کا ہر جانور پر اس کے مزاج کے مطابق اثر ہوتا ہے۔ یہی حال جانوروں کی مختلف نسلوں پر منحصر ہے۔ کسی میں زیادہ کسی میں کم۔ گائے فریزین جرسی کے قابلے میں زیادہ اثر قبول کرتی ہے اور جرسی ساہیوال کے مقابلے میں زیادہ اثر قبول کرتی ہے۔ کسان پر منحصر ہے کہ وہ ہر نسل کے مزاج کو مد نظر رکھتے ہوئے اسے گرمی کے دبائو سے محفوظ رکھے۔

    گرمی کے موسمی دبائو کی علامات:

    جب گرمی کا دبائو جانور کی قوتِ برداشت سے زیادہ ہو جائے تو درج ذیل علامات ظاہر ہوتی ہیں:
    1 ۔ سانس تیز ہو جانا
    2۔ جانور میں پانی کی طلب کا زیادہ ہو جانا
    3۔ پسینہ زیادہ آنا
    4۔ جسم میں پانی کی کمی ہو جانا
    5۔ خوراک کی طلب کم اور تمام باتوں کے نتیجے میں دودھ بھی کم ہو جانا
    اس کے نتیجے میں ایک اچھا مویشی پال گرمی کے دبائو کی موجودگی کو مزید ان علامات سے نوٹ کر سکتا ہے:
    1۔ جانور کسی سائے کی تلاش کرتا ہے
    2۔ زبان باہر نکالتا ہے
    3۔ جانور اکٹھے رہنا پسند کرتے ہیں
    4۔ کھڑا رہنا بیٹھنے سے بہتر سمجھتے ہیں
    5۔ اگر پانی مہیا ہو تو بھینس پانی میں بیٹھناپسند کرے گی اور گائے کھڑا ہونا پسند کرے گی اور جانور پانی کے قریب قریب نظر آئیں گے۔
    اگر مویشی پال بے خبر ہیں تو جانور پر گرمی کے برے اثرات کو کوئی نہیں روک سکتا اور اس کے نتیجے میں جانوروں کا ٹمپریچر بڑھنا شروع ہو جائے گا اور جانور کے نارمل ٹمپریچر سے پانچ یونٹ ٹمپریچر بڑھنے سے جانوروں کے دودھ کی پیداوار 2 لٹر تک کی کمی ہو سکتی ہے۔

    جانوروں کو گرمی کے دبائو سے کیسے محفوظ رکھیں؟

    مویشی پال حضرات ان اثرات کا تدارک کیسے کریں؟

    ٭ صاف ستھرے تازہ پانی تک جانوروں کی پہنچ کو یقینی بنانا۔ اس قسم کے حالات میں دودھ دینے والے جانور 120 لیٹر یومیہ پی سکتا ہے۔
    ٭ غذا میں ریشے والی خواراک کی فراہمی زیادہ کی جائے اور ونڈا کو شام کے وقت دیا جائے جب ٹمپریچر کم ہو تاکہ جانور کا نظامِ انہضام متاثر نہ ہو۔
    ٭ جانوروں کے باڑے میں درخت جھنڈ کی شکل میں لگے ہوں تاکہ چاروں طرف سے سائے کو یقینی بنایا جا سکے۔ جن جانوروں پر کسی بیماری ، نسل یا کسی اور وجہ سے گرمی کی شدت کا احساس زیادہ نمایاں ہو تو ان کو علیحدہ رکھا جائے اور اصل وجہ کو سامنے رکھ کر خصوصی بندوبست کیا جائے
    ٭ دودھ دوہنے کا وقت کم ٹمپریچر کا وقت تریب دیا جائے۔ جو مویشی پال پنکھے اور اور کولنگ کا بندوبست کر سکتے ہوں تو ضرور کریں تاکہ جانوروں کے ارد گرد کا محول قابل برداشت ہو سکے پسینے کی وجہ سے نمکیات پسینے اور سانس کے تیز اخراج کی وجہ سے نمکیات کی کمی کو دور کرنے کے کھرلی میں نمک کی ڈلی رکھی جائے ۔

    Role of Agriculture in Pakistan Economy

    Agriculture is a vital sector of Pakistan's economy and accounted for 25.9 percent of GDP in 1999-2000, according to government estimates. The sector directly supports three-quarters of the country's population, employs half the labor force , and contributes a large share of foreign exchange earnings. The main agricultural products are cotton, wheat, rice, sugarcane, fruits, and vegetables, in addition to milk, beef, mutton, and eggs. Pakistan depends on one of the world's largest irrigation systems to support production. There are 2 principal seasons. Cotton, rice, and sugarcane are produced during the kharif season, which lasts from May to November. Wheat is the major rabi crop, which extends from November to April. The key to a much-needed improvement of productivity lies in a more efficient use of resources, principally land and water. However, change is dependent on the large landowners who own 40 percent of the arable land and control most of the irrigation system, which makes widespread reform difficult. Assessments by independent agencies, including the World Bank, show these large landholdings to be very unproductive. Pakistan is a net importer of agricultural commodities. Annual imports total about US$2 billion and include wheat, edible oils, pulses, and consumer foods.
    Pakistan is one of the world's largest producers of raw cotton. The size of the annual cotton crop—the bulk of it grown in Punjab province—is a crucial barometer of the health of the overall economy, as it determines the availability and cost of the main raw material for the yarn-spinning industry, much of which is concentrated around the southern port city of Karachi. Official estimates put the 1999-2000 harvest at some 11.2 million 170-kilogram bales, compared with the 1998-99 outturn of 8.8 million bales and the record 12.8 million bales achieved in 1991-92. The government recently actively intervened in the market to boost prices and to encourage production. A major problem is that the cotton crop is highly susceptible to adverse weather and pest damage, which is reflected in crop figures. After peaking at 2.18 million tons in 1991-92, the lint harvest has since fluctuated considerably, ranging from a low of 1.37 million tons in 1993-94 to a high of 1.9 million tons in 1999-2000.
    The 2000-01 wheat crop was forecast at a record 19.3 million tons, compared to 17.8 million tons produced during the previous year. This increase is due largely to favorable weather and a 25-percent increase in the procurement price to about US$135 per ton. About 85 percent of the crop is irrigated. Despite the record production, Pakistan will continue to be a major wheat importer. The government has imported an average of US$2.4 million annually over the past 5 years. The United States and Australia are the major suppliers. Demand for wheat is increasing from Pakistan's rapidly growing population as well as from cross-border trade with Afghanistan.
    Pakistan is a major rice exporter and annually exports about 2 million tons, or about 10 percent of world trade. About 25 percent of exports is Pakistan's famous fragrant Basmati rice. Rice is Pakistan's second leading source of export earnings. Private traders handle all exports. Pakistan's main competitors in rice trade are Thailand, Vietnam, and India.
    Tobacco is grown mainly in the North-West Frontier Province and Punjab and is an important cash crop . Yields in Pakistan are about twice those for neighboring countries largely due to the extension services provided by the industry. Quality, however, is improving only slowly due to problems related to climate and soil. Farmers have started inter-cropping tobacco with vegetables and sugarcane to increase returns. About half of the total production is used for cigarette manufacturing and the remainder used in traditional ways of smoking (in hand-rolled cigarettes called birris, in water pipes, and as snuff). The share of imported tobacco is increasing gradually in response to an increased demand for high-quality cigarettes.
    Minor crops account for only 5 percent of total cultivated area; these include oilseeds (sunflower, soybean), chilies, potatoes, and onions. Domestic oilseed production accounts only for about 25 percent of Pakistan total edible oil needs. As a result, Pakistan spends more than US$1 billion annually in scarce foreign exchange to import edible oils, while its oilseed processing industry operates at less than 25 percent of capacity due to an inadequate supply of oilseeds. For 2000-01 total oilseed production was forecast to decrease 10 percent to 3.6 million tons. The government has highlighted development of the oilseed sector as a priority.
    Pakistan's fishing industry is relatively modest, but has shown strong growth in recent years. The domestic market is quite small, with per capita annual consumption of approximately 2 kilograms. About 80 percent of production comes from marine fisheries from 2 main areas, the Sindh coast east from Karachi to the Indian border, and the Makran coast of Baluchistan. Ninety percent of the total marine catch is fish; the shrimp which constitute the remainder are prized because of their greater relative value and demand in foreign markets. During 1999-00, total fish production was 620,000 tons, of which 440,000 tons consisted of sea fish and the remainder were fresh-water species. About one-third of the catch is consumed fresh, 9 percent is frozen, 8 percent canned, and about 43 percent used as fish meal for animal food.
    Livestock accounts for 40 percent of the agricultural sector and 9 percent of the total GDP. Principal products are milk, beef, mutton, poultry, and wool. During 1999, the livestock population increased to 120 million head. That same year Pakistan generated 970,000 tons of beef, 640,000 tons of mutton, and 190,000 tons of poultry. In an effort to enhance milk and meat production, the government recently launched a comprehensive livestock development project with Asian Development Bank assistance. Poultry production provides an increasingly popular low-cost source of protein. Modern poultry production is constrained by high mortality, high incidence of disease, poor quality chicks, and poor quality feed, combined with an inadequate marketing system. Frozen poultry have only recently been introduced.
    Forests cover an area of 4.2 million hectares or about 5 percent of the total area of Pakistan. The principal forest products are timber, principally for house construction, furniture, and firewood. Many of the country's wooded areas are severely depleted as a result of over-exploitation. The government has restricted cutting to protect remaining resources—though corruption often jeopardizes environmental efforts—and has lowered duties to encourage imports. Forestry production has since declined from 1.07 million cubic meters in 1990-91 to 475,000 cubic meters in 1998-99. Pakistan imports an estimated US$150 million of wood products annually to meet the requirements of a growing population and rising demand by a wealthy elite.
     
    Support : agrinfobank.com | Oasis Agro Industries Pakistan
    Copyright © 2012. Agriculture Information Bank - All Rights Reserved
    Template Created by agrinfobank.com Team Published by agrinfobank Blog Team
    Proudly powered by Blogger